Is zeer licht maar de lenzen zijn eerder geschikt voor kinderen want zeer klein ....

Das Opernglas ist durch seinen kleinen Linsendurchmesser von 10 mm extrem lichtschwach. Zudem ist das Teil zu 100% aus Plastik und mir fast zu klein um es komfortabel auf die Entfernung einstellen zu können. Ich suche eine etwas größere und v.a. lichtstärkere Variante, gerne mit Linsen aus Glas und Gehäuse aus Metall. War also ein klassischer Fehlkauf. Mein individuelles Empfinden lässt sich sicherlich nicht 1:1 auf andere Interessenten übertragen, deswegen trotzdem 3 von 5 Sternen.

Fehlkauf...ist nicht zu gebrauchen

Das Fernglas ist leicht und handlich und erfüllt seinen Zweck.

Perfect for carrying in a small clutch bag, surprisingly good for something so small.

Nikon游とほぼ同じ仕様、4倍のコンパクトな双眼鏡です。接眼部分はそっくりなのでもしかすると本当に同じ会社の製品かもしれません。外装が安っぽいのは仕方ないとしても、フォーカスが固くて、覗きながらピント合わせするのは大変です。見えもより高価な双眼鏡とは違います。個体差かもしれませんが、調整・検品などのコストは下げているのでしょう。ちょっと酷評っぽくなりましたが、本当に小さくて軽く、常にカバンに放り込んでおいても気になりません。Nikon游に比べると圧倒的に安価(3000円台)なので、質の悪いオペラグラスを使うよりは、こちらの方がよいのではないでしょうか。- 追記 -特にぶつけたりしたわけではないので光軸がずれてしまいましたが調整のしようがありません。オイルのようなものがしみだしてきてレンズが汚れます。お金の無駄でした。

Ein leichtes, handliches Opernglas mit gutem Durchblick. Der perfekte Begleiter ins Theater ... oder alle anderen Zwecke. Bin mit der Qualität sehr zufrieden und denke, hier gibt es ein preislich akzeptables Fernglas mit guter Leistung.

Been a binocular freak for years. I've got some small ones, but wanted something even smaller, easily totable in a pocket without a big lump. So I found two here on Amazon. Got both of them, so thought I'd review them as a comparison. I'll copy and paste this into both listings.First is the Hammers Mini Compact Small Auto Perma Focus Binocular.Second is the Carson OperaView 4x10mm Ultra Compact Binocular (OV-410).Both are very small, with the Carson being the smallest. It's tiny! About the size and shape of a pack of playing cards. This is an amazing little item...very good optics, and it focuses down to about 4.5 feet! So it can be used for studying butterflies, tide pool creatures etc. It doesn't have fold down eye cups for use with glasses, but it has plenty of eye relief, so it works fine with glasses as-is! That's an advantage, as one doesn't need to fold the cups to share around with spectacle and non-spectacle folks. It doesn't have separate adjustments between the eyes to compensate for unequal vision...but doesn't need it, at least for me. My eyes are fairly different, -0.5 and -1.5 diopters correction, but things look fine with or without glasses. This has to do with optics, but also being able to focus at a point that is a good compromise between the eyes. Of course with glasses, there's no issue, as the glasses correct for the eye difference.This is similar to a pair of Zeiss 10x25 I have. Again, no eye-to-eye adjustment, but none needed for them. This is not true of all binoculars--again something to do with optics. And your mileage may vary, depending on your correction, astigmatism, etc. In any case, since the Carson's have enough eye relief for glasses, it shouldn't be a problem. Some reviewers have said these feel cheap and plasticky...but to me, they feel well built and extremely light weight. The bending and focusing actions are smooth and they appear to be well put together. They will fit in almost any pocket (opened out flat and slid in long-ways), but I would not recommend putting any binocs in tight jeans pockets. As some have noted, they come with a wrist strap, and only one attachment on the right-hand side. They'd hang diagonal with a neck strap, but I prefer the wrist strap method. Still, they should have included a second eyelet on the other side for those who want it. Hear that Carson?The Hammers binocs are longer, wider, and fatter, but still much smaller than your typical mini-binoculars. However, both of these glasses are lower power than the usual minis. The Carson is 4x and the Hammers 6x. This is the price one pays for small size, but each one will be great for casual observing. The Hammers, with bigger lenses, will do better in the evening, but again, this is a price to pay for size. The Carsons are so small you'll have no hesitation popping them in any jacket pocket.The Hammers are what's called Perma Focus, meaning there is no focus wheel. I had big doubts about this..basically the focus is set at the factory. However, this has some merits. First, the Hammers are much less expensive than the Carsons. The have a very good feel and seem to be well built. The surface is more frictional than the Carsons, and that's good, because with something this small, grippier is better. The Hammers do have neck strap attachments, strap included. Back to Perma Focus...they work fine beyond about forty feet or so, typical binocular distances. With these, your eye does the focusing at intermediate distances--I can feel my eyes changing focus, sort of like when you look at your hand, then look up far away. I suppose if you have had eye lenses replaced, this might not work well.The Hammers have fold-down rubber eye cups for glasses wearers. My pair at first wouldn't stay folded down, but after a bit of massaging the folded edges and holding them down, now they stay in place. This is fortunate, because viewing without my glasses does not get good focus in my weaker eye. With the Carsons, I could compensate with the focus wheel. With the Hammers, I can close my weak eye, but since they work fine with glasses, it's not a problem. The Hammers would be great gifts for kids, since there's nothing to adjust except bending in the middle for eye width. People have to learn to adjust compensation wheels and focus, but not with these...hold 'em up and that's it. Probably makes them more dust and moisture resistant too, since the optics don't move and there's no center focus mechanism to worry about.In short, I love both these binocs. The Carsons are worth the price because of the size and optical quality, plus the wide range of focus. The Hammers are rough and tough and great for kids, with a little more power too. And a much lower price. Hope this review helps folks get to know these binocs beforehand. Neither are powerhouses, but that's not the point of something this small. Also, don't confuse these with "field glasses" which are often billed as binoculars and can be very small, even folding up. But those don't have prisms, as both of these do. Prisms allow a folded light path, which means better optics in a small size, and more power for the length.Happy viewing!

I've been looking around for some time for a compact set of opera glasses / binoculars for music concerts and live theater. The Carson OperaView was a great choice and I am very happy with it. It's very compact, extremely light and will fit easily in a man's jacket or shirt pocket, or all but the tiniest women's purse. The style is neutral so both sexes will feel comfortable holding it.It does have a bit of a plasticky look and feel, but the hinged centerpiece and focus work smoothly and the workmanship is good. Besides being so light and compact, the best feature is the good quality of the optics for both clarity and color, and reasonably wide field of view. I wear glasses and did not have problems using these. It come with a very handy wrist strap that reduces the chances of loosing or dropping it. Like another reviewer's comment, the carrying case could be a bit larger to make it easier to slip them into.The price point is neither cheap (its not a toy), nor overly expensive. Overall, this is exactly what I was looking for and I would highly recommend it. Thanks to the many others who have previously reviewed this product. Your positive comments helped me make a great choice.